OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess routine pelvic CT both f
or accuracy in diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and for frequency of det
ection of clinically unsuspected pelvic thrombi.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed the CT records of patients who had under
gone pelvic CT during a 6-month period and cross-referenced these records t
o reports on lower extremity venous sonography to identify patients who had
undergone this test within I week of pelvic CT. We compared the frequency
and location of venous thrombosis revealed through these two tests. To iden
tify unsuspected deep Venous thrombosis detected on pelvic CT, we reviewed
the charts of patients for whom a clot was reported to determine if it had
been clinically suspected before CT.
RESULTS. Among the 52 patients who underwent both CT and lower extremity ve
nous sonography, the findings were in agreement for 49 (94%). The technique
s disagreed for three patients; two patients had deep venous thrombosis det
ected on sonography but not on CT and the other had a clot detected on CT b
ut not on sonography. The prevalence of unsuspected deep venous thrombosis
detected by CT was 1.1%, and 73% of these patients underwent anticoagulatio
n therapy without further confirmatory tests.
CONCLUSION. Unsuspected deep venous thrombosis is commonly seen on routine
pelvic CT and should be carefully sought during such examinations. CT appea
rs to be relatively accurate in the detection of deep venous thrombosis. Th
us, CT venography combined with pulmonary CT angiography may significantly
increase the percentage of patients who are appropriately treated for throm
boembolic disease because both deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli
can be identified by this combined test.