M. Reta et al., Comparative study of hydrocarbon, fluorocarbon, and aromatic bonded RP-HPLC stationary phases by linear solvation energy relationships, ANALYT CHEM, 71(16), 1999, pp. 3484-3496
The retention properties of eight alkyl, aromatic, and fluorinated reversed
-phase high-performance liquid chromatography bonded phases were characteri
zed through the use of linear solvation energy relationships (LSERs), The s
tationary phases were investigated in a series of methanol/water mobile pha
ses. LSER results show that solute molecular size and hydrogen bond accepto
r basicity under all conditions are the two dominant retention controlling
factors and that these two factors are linearly correlated when either diff
erent stationary phases ai:a fixed mobile-phase composition or different mo
bile-phase compositions at a fixed stationary phase are considered. The lar
ge variation in the dependence of retention on solute molecular volume as o
nly the stationary phase is changed indicates that the dispersive interacti
ons between nonpolar solutes and the stationary phase are quite significant
relative to the energy of the mobile-phase cavity formation process. PCA r
esults indicate that one PCA factor is required to explain the data when st
ationary phases of the same chemical nature (alkyl, aromatic, and fluoroalk
yl phases) are individually considered. However, three PCA factors are not
quite sufficient to explain the whole data set for the three classes of sta
tionary phases. Despite this, the average standard deviation obtained by th
e use of these principal component factors are significantly smaller than t
he average standard deviation obtained by the LSER approach, In addition, s
electivities predicted through the LSER equation are not in complete agreem
ent with experimental results. These results show that the LSER model does
not properly account for all molecular interactions involved in RP-HPLC. Th
e failure could reside in the Vt solute parameter used to account for both
dispersive and cohesive interactions since "shape selectivity" predictions
for a pair of structural isomers are very bad.