Rl. Bauer et al., COMPARISON OF HISTOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS BETWEEN STEREOTAXIC CORE NEEDLE-BIOPSY AND OPEN SURGICAL BIOPSY, Annals of surgical oncology, 4(4), 1997, pp. 316-320
Background: This study correlates the histologic findings of stereotac
tic core needle biopsy (SCNB) with open surgical biopsy (OSB) and iden
tifies which lesions can be treated definitively based only on the SCN
B histology. Methods: Women who underwent SCNB between July 1, 1993, a
nd January 1, 1969, were identified by retrospective chart review. Mam
mographic (MGM) lesions found by SCNB to be ductal or lobular hyperpla
sia with atypia, or carcinoma underwent OSB. When the histologic findi
ngs by SCNB were inconsistent with the MGM findings, the lesion also u
nderwent OSB. Results: 799 women underwent SCNB with 96 (12%) of these
going on to OSB. MGM findings in the 92 who presented without a palpa
ble mass included microcalcifrcations (MCS) in 39, mass in 47, MCS and
mass in 7, and tissue distortion in 3. One hundred one breast lesions
biopsied first by SCNB, then by OSB were correlated histologically. S
ensitivity of SCNB is 89%, with a specificity of 94%. Eight-four women
(88%) were able to have definitive treatment at time of OSB because o
f prior SCNB, and 703/799 (88%) of woman were spared OSB entirely. Con
clusion: SCNB accurately identifies benign breast histology and invasi
ve cancers in women with MGM abnormalities, a distinct advantage over
fine needle aspiration cytology. SCNB does not reliably identify women
with DCIS and invasion. All women with SCNB diagnosis of ductal or lo
bular atypia should also undergo OSB.