Bg. Blijenberg et al., On the standardization of total prostate-specific antigen: an exercise with two reference preparations, CLIN CH L M, 37(5), 1999, pp. 545-552
In this study, 112 serum samples were analyzed for total prostate-specific
antigen with three well-established assays i.e. Tandem R and Tandem E (both
from Hybritech Inc., San Diego, USA) and Prostatus Free/Total from Wallac
Oy, Turku, Finland. Thirty-two samples were collected from prostate cancer
patients, 32 from patients with benign prostate hyperplasia and 48 from men
participating in a screening study for prostate cancer.
The aim of the study was to compare the results before and after recalculat
ion with the data obtained with two reference preparations for total prosta
te-specific antigen: Stanford 90:10 PSA Calibrator and Certified Reference
Material 613 Prostate-Specific Antigen.
Comparing the actual results revealed almost perfect correlations between T
andem R and Tandem E and between both Tandem assays and Prostatus. We obser
ved statistically significant differences in accuracy between Tandem R and
Tandem E:
y(Tandem E) = 1.05 x (Tandem R) + 0.07
and between Tandem E and Prostatus:
y(Prostatus) = 0.94 x (Tandem E) + 0.02
In both comparisons prostate-specific antigen values ranged from 0-40 mu g/
l.
Recalculation with both reference preparations did not solve these discrepa
ncies. One exception was the combination Tandem R and Tandem E. The applica
tion of either reference preparation solved the differences in accuracy her
e.
In conclusion, even after recalibration, assays for total prostate-specific
antigen are still not completely interchangeable.