Management of acid-related dyspepsia in general practice - Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing an omeprazole vs an antacid-alginate/ranitidine management strategy
I. Mason et Nj. Marchant, Management of acid-related dyspepsia in general practice - Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing an omeprazole vs an antacid-alginate/ranitidine management strategy, CLIN DRUG I, 18(2), 1999, pp. 117-124
Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the relative cost effe
ctiveness of an omeprazole strategy versus an antacid-alginate/ranitidine s
trategy for the management of acid-related dyspepsia in general practice fr
om a third-party payer perspective.
Patients and Methods: A retrospective economic assessment of direct medical
costs of treatment was performed on data from a prospective, open-label, r
andomised, parallel-group, 16-week clinical trial. 725 patients with a mini
mum 1-month history of dyspepsia were randomised to receive either omeprazo
le 10mg once every morning, increasing to 20mg once every morning and 40mg
once every morning as required, or antacid-alginate 10ml four times daily,
with the addition of ranitidine 150mg twice daily and 150mg four times dail
y as required, for 16 weeks.
Results: A greater proportion of patients receiving the omeprazole clinical
management strategy had achieved the stringent health target of complete s
ymptom relief (61 vs 40%, p < 0.0001) at 16 wee ks. Sufficient symptom reli
ef at 16 weeks was achieved by 70% of the omeprazole treatment group compar
ed with 51% of the antacid-alginate/ranitidine group (p < 0.0001). In the o
meprazole clinical management strategy arm, the average medication cost per
patient was higher (pound 99 vs pound 65), whilst the average general prac
titioner consultation cost per patient was lower (pound 30 vs pound 37) com
pared with the alternative strategy. The cost per patient with complete sym
ptom relief at 16 weeks was 35% higher with the antacid-alginate/ranitidine
strategy (pound 308.69) compared with the omeprazole strategy (pound 229.2
9). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that these results were robust over a
wide range of plausible assumptions.
Conclusions: These results show that an omeprazole strategy is more cost ef
fective than an antacid-alginate/ranitidine strategy for the management of
acid-related dyspepsia in general practice.