Evaluation of the potential pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interaction between fluoxetine and reboxetine in healthy volunteers

Citation
Jc. Fleishaker et al., Evaluation of the potential pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interaction between fluoxetine and reboxetine in healthy volunteers, CLIN DRUG I, 18(2), 1999, pp. 141-150
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION
ISSN journal
11732563 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
141 - 150
Database
ISI
SICI code
1173-2563(199908)18:2<141:EOTPPI>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Objective: This study was performed to assess the tolerability of combined administration of reboxetine, a selective noradrenaline (norepinephrine) re uptake inhibitor, and fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, relative to administration of each drug separately. Design: The following treatments were administered for 8 days according to a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design: (a) oral re boxetine 4mg twice daily, (b) oral fluoxetine 20mg once daily, or (c) oral reboxetine 4mg twice daily and fluoxetine 20mg once daily. Participants: Thirty healthy, nonsmoking volunteers (27 male, three female) , aged between 20 and 55 years and within 15% of normal bodyweight were inc luded in the study. Target Parameters: Plasma reboxetine enantiomers were quantified using HPLC -MS-MS. Fluoxetine and norfluoxetine concentrations were determined using h igh performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters were comp ared by unpaired t-test. Clinical laboratory data were analysed as the chan ge from baseline, and adverse events were tabulated by treatment. Vital sig n and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) data were analysed by repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: The adverse event profiles were similar for combined reboxetine an d fluoxetine relative to administration of each drug separately. Reboxetine significantly increased mean standing and supine heart rate versus baselin e, whereas heart rate was not modified by fluoxetine. No statistically sign ificant treatment effects were seen for DSST scores or oral temperature. Th e area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours for S,S (+) reboxetine was approximately 23% higher with fluoxetine coadministratio n than with reboxetine alone, but this effect, as well as effects on other pharmacokinetic parameters for either reboxetine enantiomer, was not statis tically significant. In addition, no statistically significant effects of r eboxetine on fluoxetine or norfluoxetine pharmacokinetics were observed. Conclusion: Combined administration of reboxetine and fluoxetine was well t olerated in healthy volunteers. These results suggest minimal clinical impa ct when these drugs are administered concomitantly to depressed patients.