This literature review of studies on public meetings, workshops, and commun
ity advisory committees discusses public participation based on empirical e
vidence. Public participation "success" is defined by researchers' criteria
that are divided into two categories: (1) those that evaluate the success
of the participatory process and (2) those that evaluate the success of the
outcome of the process. We find the form of participation-public meetings,
workshops, or citizen advisory committees-does not determine process or ou
tcome success. Therefore, attempts to develop a typology of public particip
ation efforts may be problematic. However, we find some empirical support f
or practitioners' other widely accepted "rules of thumb".