Partitioning of hydrophobic organic compounds to hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin: Experimental studies and model predictions for surfactant-enhanced remediation applications

Citation
So. Ko et al., Partitioning of hydrophobic organic compounds to hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin: Experimental studies and model predictions for surfactant-enhanced remediation applications, ENV SCI TEC, 33(16), 1999, pp. 2765-2770
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology,"Environmental Engineering & Energy
Journal title
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
0013936X → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
16
Year of publication
1999
Pages
2765 - 2770
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-936X(19990815)33:16<2765:POHOCT>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Partitioning studies of hydrophobic organic compounds (HOCs) to hydroxyprop yl-beta-cyclodextrin (HPCO) and one-dimensional transport simulations were conducted to evaluate the feasibility of using HPCD to remove sorbed HOCs i n surfactant-enhanced remediation (SER) applications. HOC partitioning to H PCO was very fast, with over 95% of the complexation occurring within 10 mi n. Some influence of solution chemistry and HOC concentration on HOC- HPCD complex formation coefficients was observed; in general, the magnitude of t he effects was similar to that observed previously for a nonionic surfactan t (Tween 80) but much less than that for an anionic surfactant (sodium dode cyl sulfate, SDS). HPCO sorption on kaolinilte as quantified by both a fluo rescence technique and total organic carbon measurements was negligible, in dicating no significant affinity of HPCO for the solid phase. Although the HOC solubilization capability of HPCD was lower than that of conventional s urfactants such as SOS and Tween 80, transport simulations showed that HPCO can be effective in removing sorbed HOCs from a model subsurface environme nt, primarily because of its negligible sorption to the solid phase (i.e., all HPCD added facilitates HOC elution). However, in contrast with SDS and Tween 80, HPCD becomes relatively less effective for HOC partitioning with increasing HOC size and hydrophobicity. Therefore, comparisons between HPCD and conventional surfactants for enhanced remediation applications must co nsider the specific HOC(s) present and the potential for surfactant materia l losses to the solid phase as well as other generally recognized considera tions such as material costs and potential toxicological effects.