Visuospatial attentional functioning in mice: interactions between cholinergic manipulations and genotype

Citation
T. Humby et al., Visuospatial attentional functioning in mice: interactions between cholinergic manipulations and genotype, EUR J NEURO, 11(8), 1999, pp. 2813-2823
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
ISSN journal
0953816X → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
2813 - 2823
Database
ISI
SICI code
0953-816X(199908)11:8<2813:VAFIMI>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Attentional functioning in mice was assessed in an analogue of the five-cho ice serial reaction time task in which the requirement was to detect brief visual stimuli presented across five spatial locations. Two hybrid strains of mice were assessed; F1 C57Bl/6xDBA/2 and C57Bl/6x129sv. Both strains acq uired the task to high levels of performance with, in particular, no proble ms due to premature responding. At performance, systematic manipulation of the task parameters indicated a pattern of effects consistent with the task , taxing aspects of visuospatial attention. There were some differential ef fects of task manipulations at baseline across strain. However, the pattern of effects suggested these were likely to be the result of effects on fact ors other than attentional functioning per se, such as behavioural reactivi ty and inhibition. There was evidence in both strains of specific, centrall y mediated effects of scopolamine on attentional functioning, with the C57B l/6xDBA/2 hybrid showing greater sensitivity to the drug manipulation. Spec ific effects on discriminative accuracy were observed at doses of 0.02 and 0.2 mg/kg scopolamine. At the 2 mg/kg dose, large reductions in accuracy we re associated with large effects on other measures, including omissions and response latencies, suggestive of nonspecific effects on task performance. These data indicate, for the first time, the utility of operant methods in assessing visuospatial attentional functioning in mice. They confirm the i mportance of cholinergic mechanisms in attentional processes across species , and suggest interactions between cholinergic mechanisms and genotype in t he expression of attentional phenotypes.