It is clear that many sources of evidence have contributed to our grasp of
what does and does not work in HIV/AIDS education. Despite this, there has
recently been a distinct move to narrow the evidence of success in this fie
ld to experimental and comparative work,with randomized controlled trials p
ositioned as the 'gold standard'. Here we take up the question of what cons
titutes evidence in HIV/AIDS education. We explore the social and historica
l factors which 'privilege' certain kinds of evidence above others and ques
tion whether there exists but one way of understanding what works best in H
IV/AIDS education. We draw expressly upon earlier insights and experience i
re educational evaluation per se and put a case that evidence gleaned throu
gh a range of research methods is more useful than exclusive reliance on ex
perimental and comparative work.