Sc. Body et al., Safety and efficacy of shed mediastinal blood transfusion after cardiac surgery: A multicenter observational study, J CARDIOTHO, 13(4), 1999, pp. 410-416
Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of shed mediastinal blood (SM
B) transfusion in preventing allogenic red blood cell(RBC) transfusion.
Design: An observational clinical study.
Setting: Twelve US academic medical centers.
Participants: Six hundred seventeen patients undergoing elective primary co
ronary artery bypass grafting.
Interventions: Patients were administered SMB transfusion or not, according
to institutional and individual practice, without random assignment.
Measurements and Results: The independent effect of SMB transfusion on post
operative RBC transfusion was examined by multivariable modeling. Potential
complications of SMB transfusion, such as bleeding and infection, were exa
mined. Three hundred twelve of the study patients (51%) received postoperat
ive SMB transfusion (mean volume, 554 +/- 359 mt). Patients transfused with
SMB had significantly lower volumes of RBC transfusion than those not rece
iving SMB (0.86 +/- 1.50 v 1.08 +/- 1.65 units; p < 0.05). However, multiva
riable analysis showed that SMB transfusion was not predictive of postopera
tive RBC transfusion. Demographic factors (older age, female sex), institut
ion, and postoperative events (greater chest tube drainage, lower hemoglobi
n level on arrival to the intensive care unit, and use of inotropes) were s
ignificant predictors of RBC transfusion. The volume of chest tube drainage
on the operative day (707 +/- 392 v 673 +/- 460 mt; p = 0.30), reoperation
for hemorrhage (3.1% v 2.5%; p = 0.68), and overall frequency of infection
(5.8% v 6.6%; p = 0.81) were similar between patients receiving and not re
ceiving SMB, respectively. However, in patients who did not receive allogen
ic RBC transfusion, there was a significantly greater frequency of wound in
fection in the SMB group (3.6% v 0%; p = 0.02).
Conclusion: These data suggest that SMB is ineffective as a blood conservat
ion method and may be associated with a greater frequency of wound infectio
n. Copyright (C) 1999 by W.B. Saunders Company.