Implementation of risk assessment and classification of pressure ulcers asquality indicators for patients with hip fractures

Citation
L. Gunningberg et al., Implementation of risk assessment and classification of pressure ulcers asquality indicators for patients with hip fractures, J CLIN NURS, 8(4), 1999, pp. 396-406
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
ISSN journal
09621067 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
396 - 406
Database
ISI
SICI code
0962-1067(199907)8:4<396:IORAAC>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The aims of the study were (i) to investigate the prevalence of pressure ul cers in patients with hip fracture, on arrival at a Swedish hospital, at di scharge, and two weeks post-surgery; (ii) to test whether clinical use of t he Modified Norton Scale (MNS) could identify patients at risk for developm ent of pressure ulcers; and (iii) to compare the reported prevalence of pre ssure: ulcer in the experimental group, where risk assessment and classific ation of pressure ulcers was performed on a daily basis, with that of the c ontrol group, where it was not. The study design was prospective, with an experimental and a control group. The intervention in the experimental group consisted of risk assessment, r isk alarm and skin observation performed by the nurse on duty, in the A & E Department, and daily throughout the hospital stay. To facilitate the nurse's assessment, a 'Pressure Ulcer Card' was developed , consisting of the MNS and descriptions of the four stages of pressure ulc ers. On arrival at the hospital, approximate to 20% of patients in both groups h ad pressure ulcers. At discharge, the rate had increased to 40% (experiment al) and 36% (control), Clinical use of the MNS made it possible to identify! the majority of patie nts at risk for development of pressure ulcers, Patients who were confused on arrival developed significantly more pressure ulcers than patients who w ere orientated to time and place. No significant difference was found in the reported prevalence of pressure ulcers between the experimental and control groups.