Effect of electrode configuration and capacitor size on internal atrial defibrillation threshold using leads currently used for ventricular defibrillation.
R. Neri et al., Effect of electrode configuration and capacitor size on internal atrial defibrillation threshold using leads currently used for ventricular defibrillation., J INTERV C, 3(2), 1999, pp. 149-153
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Background: Previous studies have shown that endocardial atrial defibrillat
ion, using lead configurations specifically designed for ventricular defibr
illation, is feasible but the substantial patient discomfort might prevent
the widespread use of the technique unless significant improvements in shoc
k tolerability are achieved. It has been suggested that the peak voltage or
the peak current but not the total energy delivered determines the patient
pain perception and therefore, lower defibrillating voltage and current ac
hieved with modifications in lead and waveforms may increase shock tolerabi
lity. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect, on the atrial defib
rillation threshold (ADFT), of the addition of a patch electrode (mimicking
the can electrode) to the right ventricle (RV)-superior vena cava (SVC) le
ad configuration. The influence of capacitor size on ADFT using the RV-SVCskin patch configuration was also assessed.
Methods: In 10 patients (pts) (Group 1) cardioversion thresholds were evalu
ated using biphasic shocks in two different configurations: 1) right ventri
cle (RV) to superior vena cava (SVC); 2) RV to SVC+skin patch. In a second
group of twelve patients (Group 2) atrial defibrillation thresholds of biph
asic waveforms that differed with the total capacitance (90 or 170 mu F) we
re assessed using the RV to SVC+skin patch configuration.
Results: In Group 1 AF was terminated in 10/10 pts (100 %) with both config
urations. There was no significant difference in delivered energy at the de
fibrillation threshold between the two configurations (7.1 +/- 5.1 J vs 7.1
+/- 2.6 J; p > 0.05). In group 2 AF was terminated in 12/12 pts (100%) wit
h both waveforms. The 170 mu F waveform provided a significantly lower defi
brillating voltage (323.7 +/- 74.6 V vs 380 +/- 70.2 V; p < 0.03) and curre
nt (8.1 +/- 2.7 A vs 10.0 +/- 2.3 A; p < 0.04) than the 90 mu F waveform. A
ll pts, in both groups, perceived the shock of the lowest energy tested (18
0 V) as painful or uncomfortable.
Conclusions: The addition of a patch electrode to the RV-SVC lead configura
tion does not reduce the ADFT. Shocks from larger capacitors defibrillate w
ith lower voltage and current but pts still perceive low energy subthreshol
d shocks as painful or uncomfortable.