Mc. Morey et al., Spinal-flexibility-plus-aerobic versus aerobic-only training: Effects of arandomized clinical trial on function in at-risk older adults, J GERONT A, 54(7), 1999, pp. M335-M342
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES
Background As exercise is associated with favorable health outcomes, impair
ed older adults may benefit from specialized exercise interventions to achi
eve gains in function. The purpose of this study was to determine the added
benefit of a spinal flexibility-plus-aerobic exercise intervention versus
aerobic-only exercise on function among community-dwelling elders.
Methods. We employed a randomized clinical trial consisting of 3 months of
supervised exercise followed by 6 months of home-based exercise with teleph
one follow-up. A total of 210 impaired males and females over age 64 enroll
ed in this study. Of these, 134 were randomly assigned to either spinal fle
xibility-plus-aerobic exercise or aerobic-only exercise, with 116 individua
ls completing the study. Primary outcomes obtained at baseline, after 3 mon
ths of supervised exercise, and after 6 months of home-based exercise inclu
ded: axial rotation, maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max); functional reach, ti
med-bed-mobility; and the Physical Function Scale (PhysFunction) of the Med
ical Outcomes Study SF-36.
Results. Differences between the two interventions were minimal. Overall ch
ange scores for both groups combined indicated significant improvement far:
axial rotation (p = .0011), VO(2)max (p = .0001), and PhysFunction (p = .0
016). Secondary improvements were noted for overall health (p = .0025) and
reduced symptoms (p = .0008). Differences between groups were significant o
nly for VO(2)max (p = .0014) at 3 months with the aerobic-only group improv
ing twice as much in aerobic capacity as the spinal flexibility-plus-aerobi
c group. Repeated measures indicated both groups improved during the superv
ised portion of the intervention but tended to return toward baseline follo
wing the home-based portion of the trial.
Conclusions, Gains in physical functioning and perceived overall health are
obtained with moderate aerobic exercise. No differential improvements were
noted for the spinal flexibility-plus-aerobic intervention.