This paper is an invited Response to a recent Commentary [P.L. Foster, Rev.
Mut. Res. 436 (1999) 179-184] entitled "Are adaptive mutations due to a de
cline in mismatch repair? The evidence is lacking". The Commentary argues t
hat no evidence exists supporting the idea that mismatch repair is limiting
specifically during stationary-phase mutation. A primary concern of the au
thor is to question the method that we used previously to measure growth-de
pendent mutation. In this method, mutation rates are calculated using count
s of mutant colonies taken at times when those colonies arise, rather than
at a predetermined, fixed time, Here we show further data that illustrate w
hy this must be done to ensure accurate mutation measurements. Such accurac
y was necessary for our published determination that mismatch repair protei
ns are not limiting during growth-dependent mutation, but become so during
stationary-phase mutation. We review the evidence supporting the idea that
stationary-phase reversion of a lac frameshift mutation occurs in an enviro
nment of decreased mismatch repair capacity. Those data are substantial. Th
e data presented in the Commentary, in apparent contradiction to this idea,
do not justify the conclusion presented there. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B
.V. All rights reserved.