During the last decade, the study of fluctuating asymmetry (FA) in relation
to different fitness aspects has become a popular issue in evolutionary bi
ology, FA is suggested to be important as an index of selective advantage i
n both sexual and natural selection. Evidence for these hypotheses is obtai
ned from field studies in which FA is found to be negatively correlated wit
h various fitness components. In this paper, we demonstrate that the appare
nt significance of FA may depend on assumptions of linearity between size o
f a trait and FA, and between trait size and fitness, By means of numerical
examples, me show that even small, and probably common, deviations from th
e assumed linearity can bias the statistical analyses to such an extent tha
t it casts serious doubt on the validity of the postulated causal relations
hip between FA and fitness. We recommend reanalyses of existing data and em
phatically suggest that the underlying statistical assumptions are critical
ly evaluated in future studies of FA, especially concerning linear relation
ships between the variables.