Nachman and Heller recently suggested that previous estimates of the relati
ve magnitude of fluctuating asymmetry in morphological characters have been
biased because non-linear relationships between asymmetry and size hale no
t been considered. This suggestion cannot generally be very important becau
se (1) inclusion of a non-linear size term in regression models relating fi
tness components to asymmetry does not change the general conclusion that a
symmetry is an important predictor of fitness components, and (2) experimen
tal studies uncoupling the relationship between asymmetry and size have gen
erally found significant effects of asymmetry independent of body size on m
ating success and locomotion.