Cj. Mitchell et al., Limitations of a bidirectional control procedure for the investigation of imitation in rats: Odour cues on the manipulandum, Q J EXP P-B, 52(3), 1999, pp. 193-202
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION B-COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
Magazine-trained observer rats confronted a conspecific demonstrator pushin
g a joystick to the right or to the left for food reward before the observe
rs were given access to the joystick from the position previously occupied
by the demonstrator and rewarded for responses in both directions. For half
of the observers (group 0), the joystick was in the same position when act
ed upon by demonstrators and observers; for the other half(group 180) the m
anipulandum was rotated 180 degrees within its mounting between observation
and test. As in previous experiments using this bidirectional control proc
edure, rats in group 0 showed demonstrator-consistent responding-that is, t
hey pushed the joystick in the same direction, relative to the actor's body
, as had their demonstrators. However, group 180 showed a reverse effect: r
eliable demonstrator-inconsistent responding. These results suggest that at
tractive odour or taste cues deposited by demonstrators on the side of the
joystick contralateral to the direction of responding are sufficient to pro
duce demonstrator-consistent responding in the bidirectional control proced
ure.