Tgh. Diekwisch et al., IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AMELOGENIN AND TUFTELIN GENE-PRODUCTS DURING TOOTH DEVELOPMENT, The Journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry, 45(6), 1997, pp. 859-866
Amelogenins and tuftelins are highly specialized proteins secreted int
o the developing enamel matrix during mammalian enamel formation. Both
tuftelins and amelogenins have been associated with Various functions
during nucleation and maturation of the developing enamel matrix. In
this study we conducted experiments to investigate whether tuftelins a
nd portions of the amelogenin molecule were deposited and processed in
spatially distinguished portions of the developing enamel matrix, usi
ng antibodies specific against tuftelin or amelogenins. The amelogenin
antibodies were raised against recombinant and native amelogenins and
also included an antibody against a polypeptide encoded by amelogenin
exon 4. To compare spatial expression patterns of enamel protein epit
opes, 3-day postnatal mouse molar tooth organs were processed for para
ffin histology and cut into serial sections. Adjacent sections were ex
posed to antibodies against either tuftelin or various amelogenin epit
opes. To investigate age-related changes of enamel protein expression,
amelogenin and tuftelin antibodies were applied to tooth organs of de
velopmental stages E19 and 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 postnatal days. Tuftel
in was detected within the odontoblast processes during earlier stages
of development (E19 and 1 day postnatal), whereas during later stages
(3-11 days) it was recognized in a portion of the enamel layer adjace
nt to the dentine-enamel junction. In contrast, all four antibodies ag
ainst amelogenins reacted with parts of the ameloblast cytoplasm and t
he entire enamel layer. Using immunohistochemistry, we were not able t
o detect any differences in the spatial distribution of the four amelo
genin epitopes investigated. The spatial differences in the distributi
on of amelogenin and tuftelin as observed in this study may be intepre
ted as an indication of functional differences between both proteins d
uring early enamel biomineralization.