Four field experiments were conducted in Oklahoma to measure full-season Pa
lmer amaranth interference on cotton lint yield and fiber properties. Densi
ty of the weed ranged from 0 to 12 plants 10 m(-1) of row. Cotton lint yiel
d vs. weed density fit a linear model for densities less than or equal to 8
weeds row(-1) at Perkins and Chickasha in 1996 and at Altus in 1997. At Pe
rkins in 1997, all densities fit a linear model. For each increase of 1 wee
d row(-1), lint yield reductions were 62 kg ha(-1) (or 10.7%) and 58 kg ha(
-1) (or 11.5%) at Perkins and at Chickasha in 1996, respectively. At Perkin
s and Altus in 1997, for each 1 weed row(-1), lint yield was reduced 71 kg
ha(-1) (or 5.9%) and 112 kg ha(-1) (or 8.7%), respectively. Lint yield vs.
end-of-season weed volume fit a linear model except at Altus in 1997. For e
ach increase of 1 m(3) of weed plot(-1), cotton lint yield in 1996 was redu
ced by 1.6 and 1.5% at Perkins and Chickasha, respectively. In 1997 at Perk
ins and Altus (less than or equal to 6 weeds), each increase of 1 m(3) of w
eed plot(-1) reduced lint yield 1.6 and 2.3%, respectively. Lint yield vs.
end-of-season weed biomass fit a linear model in all four experiments. Lint
yield was reduced 5.2 to 9.3% for each increase of 1 kg of weed biomass pl
ot(-1). Fiber analyses revealed significant differences for micronaire (fib
er fineness) among weed densities in two experiments, marginal significance
in a third, and none in a fourth. An intermediate number of weeds often re
sulted in improved fiber micronaires in these environments. No other fiber
properties were influenced by weed density.