Do patients with acute medical conditions have the capacity to give informed consent for emergency medicine research?

Citation
Ha. Smithline et al., Do patients with acute medical conditions have the capacity to give informed consent for emergency medicine research?, ACAD EM MED, 6(8), 1999, pp. 776-780
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10696563 → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
776 - 780
Database
ISI
SICI code
1069-6563(199908)6:8<776:DPWAMC>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Objective: Because of stress and illness, conscious emergency medicine (EM) patients may be temporarily cognitively impaired and thus incapable of par ticipating in the informed consent process for acute care research. This pi lot study sought to assess the mental capacity of ED patients during their evaluation and treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: A prospective observational design at a university tertiary referral center. EM patients with AMI from November 1996 to February 1997 were enrolled. Whi le usual care was delivered, patients were administered three subtests of t he Wechsler Adult intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) test. Subtest scaled scores range from 1 to 19, with abnormal being less than 5. Demographic, hi storical, and environmental parameters were recorded. Patients assessed how serious they perceived their conditions; and rated their degrees of pain, nausea, breathlessness, and anxiety on 10-cm visual analog scales (VASs). T esting was repeated prior to hospital discharge. Results: Twenty-five patie nts were enrolled. Of these, two (8%) were suspected by their emergency phy sicians to have insufficient capacity to give informed consent. However, fi ve (20%) scored less than 5 on all of the WAIS-R subtests (kappa = 0.5) and eight (32%) scored less than 5 on at least one of the subtests (kappa = 0. 3). The initial median Digit Span, Comprehension, and Similarities subtest scores were 7, 5, and 6. By discharge, these improved to 8, 7, and 8, respe ctively. Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that some patients with AMI may have difficulty processing information necessary to give informed cons ent for acute care research. Routine clinical evaluation may not detect thi s cognitive defect.