Objective: To compare the patient compliances and time analyses of two meth
ods of assigning primary care providers (PCPs) to ED patients who are witho
ut a PCP: phone interview vs face-to-face interaction. Methods: Prospective
observational cohort study following an intervention, performed in a pedia
tric ED, serving a population of 1.7 million, with a census of 80,000 pedia
tric ED visits per year. Over one year, a consecutive sampling of 1,062 pat
ients evaluated in the ED and without a PCP were approached to participate
in our study (536 enrolled, 526 declined). Patients enrolled were addressed
by a nurse practitioner/social worker (NP/SW) who arranged an appointment
with a PCP, either in person (in ED) or by phone after discharge. The prima
ry outcome measure was compliance with the arranged appointment. Secondaril
y, the authors analyzed the time necessary for each approach in person-hour
s. Results: Of the 536 enrolled, 81 were excluded because data collection w
as incomplete at the time of the study's completion, leaving 455 study pati
ents. Seventy-six percent of the study patients were between the ages of 1
month and 12 years. Contact was made by phone for 151 (33%) patients and fa
ce-to-face for 304 (67%). Sixty-two percent of the phone patients kept thei
r appointments, compared with 52% of face-to-face patients (p = 0.048, RR =
1.20, 1.02 < RR < 1.41). Phone interaction was also more time effective. C
onclusion: Linking ED patients without a medical provider to PCPs via phone
is as effective as a face-to-face interaction.