Ar. Drake et al., Cost system and incentive structure effects on innovation, efficiency and profitability in teams, ACC REVIEW, 74(3), 1999, pp. 323-345
The small number of full-scale adoptions of activity-based costing (ABC) co
upled with ABC implementation failures have fueled a debate about the costs
and benefits of ABC relative to more traditional volume-based costing (VBC
) systems. ABC differs from VBC by focusing attention on activities and res
ources that are under the control of multiple workers, Reducing these costs
often requires a coordinated effort. Therefore, incentives that motivate w
orkers to cooperate are a prerequisite to successful process improvements b
ased on ABC. Alternatively, when competitive incentives are combined with A
BC, the result can be unexpected and negative. We examine how accounting co
st system and incentive structure choices interact. We find that profits ar
e highest when ABC is linked with group-based incentives, which provide hig
h motivation to cooperate. In contrast, the lowest level of profit occurs w
hen the same information-rich cost system, ABC, is coupled with tournament-
based incentives. VBC, a cost system that provides a lower level of cost dr
iver information, moderates the incentive effect. Thus, our results demonst
rate that the effectiveness of ABC relative to traditional VBC is influence
d by its interactive effect with incentive compensation.