Sublingual-swallow immunotherapy (SLIT) with a standardized five-grass-pollen extract (drops and sublingual tablets) versus placebo in seasonal rhinitis
A. Pradalier et al., Sublingual-swallow immunotherapy (SLIT) with a standardized five-grass-pollen extract (drops and sublingual tablets) versus placebo in seasonal rhinitis, ALLERGY, 54(8), 1999, pp. 819-828
Background: Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of sublingual-swa
llow immunotherapy (SLIT) in seasonal and perennial rhinitis. Sublingual ad
ministration of solutions is not convenient for all patients. The aim of th
e study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy administer
ed sublingually, initially as drops, and then as tablets during maintenance
therapy.
Methods: A total of 126 patients with grass-pollen seasonal rhinitis were i
ncluded in this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. During
the progression of doses phase, the five-grass extract was given as subling
ual drops from 1 to 100 IR/ml. Once the 100 IR dose was reached, the drops
were replaced by a single 100-IR sublingual tablet per day.
Results: Throughout the grass-pollen season, patients in the active treatme
nt group had significantly lower (P<0.05) total conjunctivitis and ocular r
edness scores. Rhinitis symptoms were not significantly different between t
he two groups. Patients given the active treatment were significantly (P<0.
02) less likely to have asthma symptoms. The global medication score showed
no significant. difference between the two groups. A highly significant di
fference in favor of the active treatment group was seen in inhaled salbuta
mol use (P<0.01).
Conclusions: Clinical benefits achieved during the present study included s
ignificant improvements in conjunctivitis symptoms and prevention of asthma
symptoms. The overall safety profile of the active treatment (drops or tab
lets) was good.