The evaluation and use of published pharmacoeconomic data are discussed.
The pharmacoeconomic literature is a vast and powerful source of informatio
n for pharmacists and others who must make decisions about services and pro
ducts. Published studies can provide data quickly and inexpensively, but th
ey may not necessarily meet criteria for quality and may not be generalizab
le to a specific situation. Guidelines are available that are intended to s
tandardize study methods, minimize potential bias, and increase the compara
bility and credibility of data. Before relying on a published study, decisi
on-makers should ensure that it meets criteria related to objective, perspe
ctive, pharmacoeconomic method, design, interventions, costs, outcomes, dis
counting, results, sensitivity analysis, extrapolation of conclusions, and
sponsorship. A sound study can be used to support decisions in such diverse
areas as individual patient treatment, formulary management, drug-use guid
eline development, disease management initiatives, and pharmaceutical servi
ce evaluation. A decision-maker may be able to use the results by applying
them at face value, employing a sensitivity analysis, performing a metaanal
ysis, incorporating the data into a pharmacoeconomic model, or reproducing
the study on a smaller scale. The selection of an application strategy shou
ld be based on the potential impact of the decision on the quality and cost
of care, with more rigorous and complex strategies reserved for more extre
me impacts.
Published pharmacoeconomic data can help pharmacists make better and more i
nformed decisions about pharmaceutical services and products.