Inglehart's postmaterialism thesis describes an individual-level process of
value change. Little attention has been devoted to validating rite respons
es to his postmaterialist-materialist index. The aggregate-level distributi
ons may appear to reflect a postmaterialist-materialist dimension, even if
at the individual level res,responses on the questions making up the index
are random. The logic of the survey questions used for the index defines a
baseline against which the actual distribution of responses can be compared
. Using such a standard, we find that individual responses are not constrai
ned by an underlying value dimension, in the sense se that the observed pat
terns of responses increasingly do not differ from what one would, expect b
y chance. Furthermore, as one would expect for a random variable, index sco
res are virtually unexplainable as a dependent variable, and they cannot be
used to predict support for various political and social issues, said to f
low from attitudes measured by the index.