Background. After 35 years of cardiac valve replacement, the ideal substitu
te remains to be found. Homografts are considered best but, due to their sc
arcity, cannot meet the need of valve replacement. Artificial valves (mecha
nical or biological) remain the most commonly used but controversy is still
present as to the better choice. We tested the Carpentier-Edwards bioprost
hesis for its efficacy in valve replacement operations.
Methods. From 1983 to 1995, 1,108 consecutive patients had an isolated aort
ic valve replacement with a porcine Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis, model
2650 supraannular valve. Mean age was 73.8 +/- 8.3 years. Aortic stenosis
was the most common lesion (1,049 patients, 94.7%). The follow-up of 980 op
erative survivors was 96% complete and represented a total of 4,735 patient
-years (maximum, 13.8 years; mean, 4 years and 10 months).
Results. Actuarial survival including operative mortality (128 patients, 11
.6%) was 43.6% +/- 2.3% at 10 years and 27.3% +/- 3.3% at 12 years and, at
that time, was not statistically different from those of the normal French
population matched for age and sex. Structural deterioration of the valve w
as observed in 27 patients, an actuarial freedom of 94.2% +/- 1.5% at 10 ye
ars and 83.8% +/- 4.5% at 12 years. Hazard function revealed a stable and l
ow risk of structural deterioration until 10 years and significantly increa
sed risk after that. Young age was found to be an increasing risk factor of
deterioration. Reoperation for valve-related complications was necessary i
n 30 patients, an actuarial freedom of 94.5% +/- 1.4% at 10 years.
Conclusions. The Carpentier-Edwards porcine supraannular valve affords a go
od durability up to 10 years, with a low rate of reoperation. The risk of s
tructural deterioration decreases with older age. It is our valve of choice
in elderly patients. (C) 1999 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.