Background. After open heart operations about 1% of patients still need tem
porary circulatory support for severe cardiac failure, and over half of tho
se patients die during or after the support. This study assessed the effica
cy of the current strategy of circulatory support.
Methods. We assessed clinical outcome of 64 consecutive patients (1.5% of p
ump cases) who had temporary circulatory support associated with perioperat
ive variables. The results were analyzed by logistic regression analysis.
Results. The weaning and discharge rates were 50.0% and 26.7% with venoarte
rial bypass, 76.2% and 57.1% with biventricular bypass, 87.5% and 37.5% wit
h isolated left ventricular bypass, and 60.0% and 40.0% with pulsatile left
ventricular assistance, respectively. Logistic regression analysis identif
ied presupport cardiogenic shock (odds ratio, 9.922) and support type (14.6
84) as factors significantly associated with nonweaning from the temporary
support, and cardiogenic shock (28.268), support duration (2.948), and supp
ort type (14.184) as factors significantly associated with mortality during
or after the circulatory support.
Conclusions, The current strategy of temporary circulatory support improved
clinical outcome of patients with severe cardiac failure. Early applicatio
n of circulatory support before profound cardiogenic shock and proper selec
tion of the support type might be key factors for successful circulatory su
pport postoperatively after operation. (C) 1999 by The Society of Thoracic
Surgeons.