Three experiments tested the hypothesis that the deficit underlying agramma
tic sentence production difficulties can be characterized as a limitation o
f computational resources and that these resources are not restricted to sy
ntactic processing. This hypothesis was tested by eliciting subject-verb ag
reement errors in a sentence fragment completion paradigm. Sentence fragmen
ts were complex noun phrases, containing a subject (head) noun and a modify
ing prepositional phrase, containing a "local" noun. We varied the number o
f "tokens" a singular head noun referred to. Therefore, in one condition, g
rammatical and conceptual number of the head noun mismatched, whereas these
numbers were the same in another condition. In Experiments 1 and 2, we obs
erved an effect of this variable (i.e., more agreement errors when conceptu
al number was plural and grammatical number singular) in normal controls. B
roca's aphasics, on the other hand, showed no effect. Experiment 3 consiste
d of a sentence/picture matching test. This test showed that the lack of ef
fect with Broca's aphasics cannot be attributed to a comprehension deficit.
We argue that these results are incompatible with the notion of a limitati
on in resources specific for syntactic processing. Instead, we interpret th
is as the result of a trade off: Broca's aphasics lack computational resour
ces to take into account both grammatical and conceptual information in mor
phosyntactic processing and rely on grammatical information only. (C) 1999
Academic Press.