Background: Medical advice columns in newspapers can provide a valuable ser
vice by educating the general public about important health-related issues.
However, these columns may be harmful if the advice or information given i
n them is incomplete, inappropriate or misleading. The objective of this st
udy was to assess the safety and appropriateness of advice given to elderly
readers of newspapers in medical advice columns.
Methods: Medical advice columns published in Canadian newspapers in 1995 we
re identified from a CD-ROM database. The articles that were selected were
published in English and contained medical advice pertinent to elderly peop
le about topics that could be found in a textbook of geriatric medicine. Fi
fty articles, randomly selected from the 109 articles that met these criter
ia, were independently assessed by 5 geriatricians. A scoring system was us
ed to rate the ability to determine to which population the article applied
, how well fact was distinguished from opinion, the degree to which critica
l issues were addressed, the safety and the appropriateness of the advice.
When the kappa statistic for inter-rater agreement was 0.74 or less, a 2-st
age Delphi process was used in an attempt to reach consensus.
Results: Agreement (kappa > 0.74) was eventually achieved for 232 (92.8%) o
f the 250 ratings. In 4 (8%) of the articles there was a high probability t
hat the advice given could be applied to the wrong patient population; in 7
(14%) there was a high probability that opinion might be interpreted as fa
ct; and in 11 (22%) the major critical issues were not identified. Of great
est concern, however, the advice in 25 (50%) of the articles was judged to
be inappropriate, and in 7 4 (28%) advice may have been dangerous and poten
tially life-threatening.
Interpretation: Although medical advice columns have the potential to impro
ve the health of elderly readers, a significant percentage of these article
s contain inappropriate or even potentially dangerous advice.