A numerical comparison of alternative three-phase reactors with a conventional trickle-bed reactor. The advantages of countercurrent flow for hydrodesulfurization

Citation
Bw. Van Hasselt et al., A numerical comparison of alternative three-phase reactors with a conventional trickle-bed reactor. The advantages of countercurrent flow for hydrodesulfurization, CHEM ENG SC, 54(21), 1999, pp. 4791-4799
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Chemical Engineering
Journal title
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00092509 → ACNP
Volume
54
Issue
21
Year of publication
1999
Pages
4791 - 4799
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-2509(199911)54:21<4791:ANCOAT>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
A computer model was developed to compare a conventional cocurrent trickle- bed reactor with two novel countercurrent three-phase reactors: the three-l evels-of-porosity reactor and the internally finned monolith reactor. The h ydrodesulfurization of a vacuum gas oil was taken as a case study. It was f ound that the application of countercurrent flow in the novel reactors resu lts in significant increase of conversion. Sensitivity for mass transfer an d H2S inhibition were investigated. Reduced mass transfer compared to a con ventional trickle-bed does not limit the reaction. (C) 1999 Elsevier Scienc e Ltd. All rights reserved.