Wm. Zachry et al., Procedure costs and outcomes associated with pharmacologic management of peripheral arterial disease in the department of defense, CLIN THER, 21(8), 1999, pp. 1358-1369
This study was undertaken to determine if differences existed between pharm
acologic treatments of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with respect to PA
D-related costs and health care outcomes in the United States Department of
Defense health care system. We performed a retrospective review of hospita
l and prescription data to explore the effects of at least 90 days of aspir
in, pentoxifylline, papaverine, or dipyridamole on 4 PAD-related outcomes:
number of PAD-related invasive procedures (INV), number of PAD-related exam
ination procedures (EXM), number of PAD-related hospitalization days (HDAYS
), and cost of PAD-related procedures (COST) during 5 years. A covariate re
presenting the number of PAD-related hospitalizations before the study peri
od was used to attempt to control for severity of disease state. General li
near models were used in the analyses. A statistically significant differen
ce was seen between treatment groups for a linear combination of INV, EXM,
HDAYS, and COST when controlling for past PAD-related hospitalizations (P <
0.014). A statistically significant relationship existed between treatment
, groups and INV (P < 0.041). The pentoxifylline treatment group had a stat
istically significant higher covariate-adjusted mean INV compared with the
aspirin treatment group (P < 0.043). Also, PAD-related past hospitalization
s were significantly related to EXM (P < 0.006). Our results appear to supp
ort the use of aspirin as a preventive treatment in PAD compared with pento
xifylline or dipyridamole.