The mental model theory postulates that reasoners build models of the situa
tions described in premises, and that these models normally make explicit o
nly what is true. The theory has an unexpected consequence: it predicts the
occurrence of inferences that are compelling but invalid. They should aris
e from reasoners failing to take into account what is false. Three experime
nts corroborated the systematic occurrence of these illusory inferences, an
d eliminated a number of alternative explanations for them. Their results i
lluminate the controversy among various current theories of reasoning. (C)
1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.