Ear decompositions of matching covered graphs

Citation
Mh. Carvalho et al., Ear decompositions of matching covered graphs, COMBINATORI, 19(2), 1999, pp. 151-174
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Mathematics,"Computer Science & Engineering
Journal title
COMBINATORICA
ISSN journal
02099683 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
151 - 174
Database
ISI
SICI code
0209-9683(1999)19:2<151:EDOMCG>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Ear decompositions of matching covered graphs are important for understandi ng their structure. By exploiting the properties of the dependence relation introduced by Carvalho and Lucchesi in [2], we are able to provide simple proofs of several well-known theorems concerning ear decompositions. Our me thod actually provides proofs of generalizations of these theorems. For exa mple, we show that every matching covered graph G different from K-2 and C- 2n has at least Delta edge-disjoint removable ears, where Delta is the maxi mum degree of G. This shows that any matching covered graph G has at least Delta! different ear decompositions, and thus is a generalization of the fu ndamental theorem of Lovasz and Plummer establishing the existence of ear d ecompositions. We also show that every brick G different from K-4 and (C) o ver bar(6) has Delta-2 edges, each of which is a removable edge in G, that is, an edge whose deletion from G results in a matching covered graph. This generalizes a well-known theorem of Lovasz. We also give a simple proof of another theorem due to Lovasz which says that every nonbipartite matching covered graph has a canonical ear decomposition, that is, one in which eith er the third graph in the sequence is an odd-subdivision of K-4 or the four th graph in the sequence is an odd-subdivision of (C) over bar(6). Our meth od in fact shows that every nonbipartite matching covered graph has a canon ical ear decomposition which is optimal, that is one which has as few doubl e ears as possible. Most of these results appear in the Ph. D. thesis of th e first author [1], written under the supervision of the second author.