Ecologists need a better understanding of how animals make decisions about
moving across landscapes. To this end, we developed computer simulations th
at contrast the effectiveness of various search strategies at finding habit
at patches in idealized landscapes (uniform, random, or clumped patches), w
here searchers have different energy reserves and face different mortality
risks. Nearly straight correlated random walks always produced better dispe
rsal success than relatively uncorrelated random walks. However, increasing
patch density decreased the degree of correlation that maximized dispersal
success. Only under high mortality and low energy reserves in a uniform la
ndscape did absolutely straight-line search perform better than any random
walk. With low mortality risks and high energy reserves, exhaustive systema
tic search was superior to the best correlated random walk; an increase in
the perceptual range of the searcher (i.e., patch detectability) also favor
ed exhaustive search over relatively straight random walks. For all conditi
ons examined, the "average distance rule," a hybrid search rule incorporati
ng both straight-line and systematic search, was best. Overall, however, ou
r results suggest that a simple and effective search rule for many landscap
e-explicit models would involve straight or nearly straight movements.