Information on environmental levels and transport processes of natural and
anthropogenic radioactivity, although plentiful, is widely scattered, and r
elatively few attempts have been made to summarize and synthesize this info
rmation. Furthermore, most experimental observations and experiments on env
ironmental radioactivity have been designed for documentation or testing of
specific hypotheses, rather than for providing key information for transpo
rt simulation models or on fundamental processes which such models seek to
represent. This paper examines three basic questions, namely (1) what is th
e current state of the science of radioecology?; (2) how well is this scien
ce being incorporated into predictive models?; and (3) how well are the mod
els being used to guide and improve the science? These discussions will be
preceded by a brief description of the field of radioecology, and comments
on its relevance to other sciences as well as to major societal problems st
emming from environmental releases of radioactivity. In addition to assessi
ng the current state of the science and its use in predictive models, speci
fic ideas for improving both the science and its associated models will be
advanced. These ideas fall under the categories of(1)environmental transpor
t processes and model parameters, (2) estimating exposure and dose to human
and ecological receptors, and (3) dose-effect relationships for plants and
animals. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.