An intercalibration exercise was carried out evaluating the transferability
and reproducibility of the rainbow trout hepatocyte cytotoxicity test. Fir
st, rainbow trout hepatocytes were plated in 96-well microplates, packed at
4 degrees C, and sent to eight different laboratories. Each laboratory was
instructed to initiate 24-h exposure on two blind samples, one of which wa
s toxic. Second, five laboratories were trained to perform the hepatocyte c
ytotoxicity test independently with their own fish source. Afterward, they
were invited to evaluate toxicity of three samples: reference toxicant (KCI
), toxic, and nontoxic industrial effluent. The labs were instructed to eva
luate cell viability with either propidium iodide exclusion test or with ne
utral red uptake assay. These two assays were proposed to accommodate labor
atories' constraints (i.e., available spectrophotometers or fluorometers, m
icroplate vs tube centrifuges). Results showed all groups were able to iden
tify toxic sample (i.e., KCI) from nontoxic one, Cytotoxic concentration at
which 50% of hepatocytes are killed (CC50) varied between 70-131 mM, when
cell viability was determined with PI test, while CC50 values varied betwee
n 82-118 mM with NRU assay. These values were in the same range as data obt
ained in our laboratory during an in-house intercalibration exercise. Moreo
ver, 4/5 of the independent laboratories could correctly classify toxicity
of the (3) samples. The rainbow trout hepatocyte cytotoxicity assessment te
st does, therefore, appear to be reproducible and transferable to other lab
oratories, producing statistically similar classifications and results for
measurement endpoints such as identification of nontoxic samples, lowest ob
servable effect concentration, and CC50 values. (C) 1999 by John Wiley & So
ns, Inc.