Ecotoxicity assessment is usually done by classical tests under controlled
conditions. However, field situations may not be accurately predicted by la
boratory testing. In situ testing is a pertinent way for assessing the ecol
ogical relevance of laboratory bioassays. The objectives of this study were
to develop an in situ test chamber and respective test protocols suitable
for ecotoxicity testing with zooplankton and to evaluate the use of laborat
ory protocols (water column and solid phase) by comparing results obtained
under controlled conditions with in situ results at an aquatic system recei
ving acid mine drainage. At the most contaminated stations and at the refer
ence stations, good agreement was found between in situ and classical testi
ng. At intermediate stations, in situ toxicity was generally higher than th
at in classical tests. Sample collection and preservation probably altered
actual toxicity, thus emphasizing the need for caution in estimating or ext
rapolating field effects from laboratory results.