A double-blind comparison of fluconazole and nystatin in the prevention ofcandidiasis in patients with leukaemia

Citation
Gar. Young et al., A double-blind comparison of fluconazole and nystatin in the prevention ofcandidiasis in patients with leukaemia, EUR J CANC, 35(8), 1999, pp. 1208-1213
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
ISSN journal
09598049 → ACNP
Volume
35
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1208 - 1213
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-8049(199908)35:8<1208:ADCOFA>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind study, the safety and efficac y of oral fluconazole (200 mu g/day) and nystatin suspension (6 000 000 IU/ day) for the prevention of fungal infections were compared in patients with leukaemia undergoing remission induction chemotherapy. Antifungal prophyla xis was initiated at the time chemotherapy was started and continued throug hout the hospital stay or the period of neutropenia to a maximum of 42 days . Prophylaxis was successful (no evidence of fungal infection or fever of u nknown origin unresponsive to antibiotics) in 38 of 56 (68%) fluconazole-tr eated and 25 of 53 (47%) nystatin-treated patients (P= 0.03). 2 patients (4 %) in the fluconazole group and 6 (11%) patients in the nystatin group deve loped systemic fungal infections (P= 0.15). The overall frequency of advers e events was similar among fluconazole-treated (29%) and nystatin-treated ( 32%); most events in both treatment groups involved the gastrointestinal tr act. These results indicated fluconazole was more effective than nystatin i n preventing Candida infections in patients with leukaemia; fluconazole was well tolerated. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.