J. Versijpt et al., The contribution of bone scintigraphy in occupational health or medical insurance claims: a retrospective study, EUR J NUCL, 26(8), 1999, pp. 804-811
Citations number
56
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Patients with a suspicion of bone damage following an industrial or traffic
accident are often referred for bone scintigraphy as part of an occupation
al health or medical insurance investigation. The aim of this study was to
assess the contribution and the potential role of bone scintigraphy compare
d with X-ray investigations in the aforementioned situation. To this end we
evaluated 70 consecutive patients referred for bone scintigraphy during 19
96 and 1997 by occupational health or medical insurance physicians. The mos
t common reasons for referral were the exclusion of occult fractures of han
ds and feet, whiplash injuries, reflex sympathetic dystrophy or avascular n
ecrosis, or the differentiation between an old and a recent vertebral fract
ure. X-rays were only available for comparative review of 53 patients, so o
nly those were analysed. The results of bone scintigraphy were compared wit
h X-rays, and their contribution and potential role in occupational health
or medical insurance investigations assessed. In 31 out of the 53 patients
investigated, bone scintigraphy findings concurred with X-rays as to the nu
mber and location of abnormalities. For 19 of the 53 patients, bone scintig
raphy showed clinically relevant additional foci when compared with X-rays,
predominantly involving lesions to hands/wrists and feet/ankles. Among the
se 19 patients, scintigraphic diagnoses were subsequently confirmed in ten
cases by means of X-ray or computed tomography. In four patients, supplemen
tary radiological investigations revealed no abnormalities, and in five pat
ients no further investigations were undertaken. Finally, in three of the 5
3 patients, X-rays revealed bone damage (burst fractures) whilst the corres
ponding bone scintigraphy was negative, thus excluding recent injury. In co
nclusion, in 22 patients, representing 42% of the cases analysed, bone scin
tigraphy was conclusive compared with X-ray imaging in the final diagnosis
and in this way in detecting occult or excluding active bone damage after a
traffic or industrial accident. This makes bone scintigraphy a useful inve
stigation in situations where a full or partial disablement claim has to be
confirmed, extended or terminated.