F. Namavar et al., MECHANISMS OF RESISTANCE TO PIPERACILLIN OF ENTEROBACTER-CLOACAE STRAINS DIFFER BY ANTIBIOTIC PRESCRIPTION POLICY, International journal of antimicrobial agents, 8(3), 1997, pp. 205-208
During a study of piperacillin resistance among aerobic Gram-negative
bacteria, 18 resistant strains of Enterobacter cloacae were obtained f
rom a General Hospital in Rotterdam and 13 from a University Hospital
in Amsterdam. The patterns of antibiotic susceptibilities were differe
nt; the Amsterdam strains were generally resistant to penicillins, the
third generation cephalosporins and temocillin, whereas the Rotterdam
strains were more often sensitive to the third generation cephalospor
ins and temocillin but more resistant to penicillins. Isoelectric focu
sing and substrate profiles showed the presence of chromosomal Class 1
beta-lactamase in ten of the Amsterdam strains: in three strains a pl
asmid mediated TEM-1 enzyme was detected. In contrast 15 of the 18 Rot
terdam strains possessed a plasmid mediated beta-lactamase, ten of whi
ch were TEM-2. Eight of the ten strains with the TEM-2 enzyme harboure
d a transferable plasmid coding for resistance to piperacillin. Endonu
clease analysis of plasmid DNA from these eight strains revealed an id
entical pattern in seven strains. Different selective pressures were o
perative in each hospital. In Amsterdam the general use of cefotaxim a
nd piperacillin favoured emergence of strains with derepressed chromos
omal Class 1 beta-lactamase, whereas in Rotterdam the use of cefuroxim
e favoured the spread of a plasmid, encoding TEM-2 beta-lactamase. (C)
1997 Elsevier Science B.V.