Small cell carcinoma of urinary bladder is differentiated from urothelial carcinoma by chromogranin expression, absence of CD44 variant 6 expression,a unique pattern of cytokeratin expression, and more intense gamma-enolaseexpression
Ka. Iczkowski et al., Small cell carcinoma of urinary bladder is differentiated from urothelial carcinoma by chromogranin expression, absence of CD44 variant 6 expression,a unique pattern of cytokeratin expression, and more intense gamma-enolaseexpression, HISTOPATHOL, 35(2), 1999, pp. 150-156
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Aims: Small cell (neuroendocrine) carcinoma of the urinary bladder is clini
cally more aggressive than urothelial (transitional cell) carcinoma. We hav
e investigated the immunohistochemical markers most useful in diagnosing sm
all cell carcinoma in bladder,
Methods and results: We evaluated the expression of chromogranin A, CD44 va
riant 6 (CD44v6), cytokeratin (CAM 5.2), gamma-enolase, synaptophysin, and
CD45 in 46 small cell carcinomas of the bladder. Small cell and urothelial
carcinoma were mixed in 21 (46%) cases. The two immunohistochemical markers
with best ability to discriminate between small cell and urothelial carcin
oma were chromogranin A and CD44v6. Chromogranin A had 97% specificity for
small cell carcinoma, staining 65% of cases with 2+/3+ mean intensity; only
one case (5%) of urothelial carcinoma was weakly (1+/3+) positive. CD44v6
was 80% specific For urothelial carcinoma, with immunoreactivity in 60% of
cases, compared with 7% of small cell carcinoma cases. In cases positive fo
r CD44v6, the mean percentage of reactive urothelial carcinoma cells was 75
% (range 10-100%), greater than the 12% of cells in three cases of small ce
ll carcinoma (P = 0.31); further, the pattern of immunoreactivity was membr
anous vs. focal cytoplasmic, respectively. All small cell carcinomas staine
d with one of the three neuroendocrine markers tested: 76% of cases were re
active for synaptophysin and 93% for gamma-enolase, with specificities of 8
6% and 73% in comparison to urothelial carcinoma, gamma-enolase staining of
small cell carcinoma was more intense (P=0.01) than for urothelial carcino
ma. Cytokeratin CAM 5.2 stained a mean 47% of cells in small cell carcinoma
, always in a punctate perinuclear pattern, and 75% in urothelial carcinoma
, in a membranous pattern.
Conclusions: CD44v6, chromogranin A, and possibly gamma-enolase and cytoker
atin (CAM 5.2) help differentiate small cell carcinoma from urothelial carc
inoma.