Intercropping of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) with barley (Hordeum vulgare), rocket salad (Eruca sativa) and linseed (Linum usitatissimum) under limited irrigation conditions in reclaimed ravine land of river Yamuna

Citation
D. Narayan et al., Intercropping of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) with barley (Hordeum vulgare), rocket salad (Eruca sativa) and linseed (Linum usitatissimum) under limited irrigation conditions in reclaimed ravine land of river Yamuna, I J AGR SCI, 69(5), 1999, pp. 321-324
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
ISSN journal
00195022 → ACNP
Volume
69
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
321 - 324
Database
ISI
SICI code
0019-5022(199905)69:5<321:IOIM(J>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the winter season (rabi) of 1990-91 to 1992-93 in reclaimed ravine land of river Yamuna at Agra to study the e ffect of intercropping Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. & Cosso n] with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), rocket salad (Eruca sativa Mill.) and linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) on yield, water-use efficiency, competitio n indices and monetary returns under limited irrigation conditions. Indian mustard-based intercropping systems were found more productive than sole cr opping of Indian mustard. Indian mustard + linseed intercropping system rec orded the highest Indian mustard equivalent yield (1 995 kg/ha), water-use efficiency (10.31 kg/ha-mm), land-equivalent ratio (1.63) and monetary retu rns (Rs 17 982/ha), whereas Indian mustard + barley intercropping system re corded the lowest yield, water-use efficiency, land-equivalent ratio and re turns. Barley and rocket salad were found dominant and linseed dominated as judged by the values of relative crowding coefficient and aggressivity. Th e yield of crops progressively increased with number of irrigation and the average increase was 33 and 58% with 1 and 2 irrigation respectively. Howev er, water-use efficiency decreased by 11% with 1 irrigation and 21% with 2 irrigation. The monetary returns increased with increasing levels of irriga tion.