Since 1990, London's SEAQ International (SEAQ-I) has attracted considerable
trading volume in Belgian equities. This paper investigates competition be
tween the Brussels CATS market and London's SEAQ-I. Toward this end, we gat
hered extensive limit order book data as well as transactions and quotation
information. With regard to liquidity (indirect costs), measured by the qu
oted and effective bid-ask spread, the paper concludes that CATS outperform
s SEAQ International for both measures. The effective spread is of course s
ubstantially smaller than the quoted spread, with the CATS effective spread
showing a U-shaped form. This paper, unique in employing an extensive data
set that includes all hidden orders and the whole limit order book, produc
es results in line with the different market microstructure models. Total t
rading costs on CATS are lower (higher) for small (large) trade sizes. (C)
1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classification: G15.