Catastrophic failure of tibial baseplates due to fatigue fracture have occu
rred in patients. The International Standards Organisation (ISO) have propo
sed an endurance test to ensure a safety level for trays with respect to th
is problem. At present the magnitude of the applied load has not been defin
ed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ISO test by comparing the
results of two tibial trays: one with a clinical history of fracture of the
tibial baseplate in some cases (Kinematic) and one without such a record (
Kinemax). A load of 2000 N was selected, representing the peak force during
the normal walking cycle. Finite element analysis (FEA) predicted that bot
h the Kinematic and Kinemax trays would rapidly fail for two defined contac
t positions. Mechanical testing performed on both these components confirme
d the FEA predictions. However, under service conditions, the Kinematic tra
y has been reported to have a failure of only 1-2%, the failure occurring a
t a mean of 54 months for early fracture and 7 years for late fracture. The
re are no published reports of failed Kinemax trays. It is concluded that t
he ISO test is an exaggeration of reality when a physiological load is used
. As a result of our study we propose that a load of 500 N would effectivel
y screen components with respect to the ISO test conditions for the likelih
ood of fracture. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.