D. Olsfanger et al., Effect of spinal versus general anesthesia on bladder compliance and intraabdominal pressure during transurethral procedures, J CLIN ANES, 11(4), 1999, pp. 328-331
Study Objective: To evaluate the influence of spinal versus general anesthe
sia on bladder compliance and intraabdominal Pressure in elderly males unde
rgoing elective transurethral resection of the Prostate
Design: Prospective, randomized, open-label study.
Setting: Teaching hospital
Patients: 21 ASA physical status I, II and III patients at feast 18 years o
f age, undergoing transurethral surgery.
Interventions: According to a computer-generated randomization schedule, pa
tients were allocated to one of two groups. In Group Spinal (S) 10 mg of hy
perbaric tetracaine was administered intrathecally. In Group, General Anest
hesia (GA) patients received fentanyl intravenous (IV) I to 2 mu g/kg and p
ropofol IV 1.0 to 2.0 mg/kg for induction of anesthesia. Thereafter, a lary
ngeal mash airway reins inserted and with spontaneous ventilation, anesthes
ia was maintained by administering isoflurane (end-tidal 0.7% to 1.2%) and
70% nitrous oxide (N2O) in oxygen. Intraabdominal pressure and bladder comp
liance were recorded prior to the induction of anesthesia and immediately b
efore the onset of the surgical Procedure.
Measurements and Main Results: The two groups were demographically comparab
le. In Group S, mean bladder compliance was significantly (p = 0.003) highe
r and mean intraabdominal pressure significantly lower (p = 0.007) when com
pared to baseline preanesthetic values. In Group GA, mean intraabdominal pr
essure significantly (p = 0.006) decreased when compared to baseline preane
sthetic recordings. Following the induction of general anesthesia, a small
change in bladder compliance was noted. However, statistical significance w
as not reached Data were analyzed and compared using Student's t-test (p <
0.05 was considered statistically significant).
Conclusion: Both spinal and general anesthesia induced a significant decrea
se in intrabdominal pressure. While both techniques were associated with an
increase in bladder compliance, statistical significance was demonstrated
only in the spinal anesthesia treatment group. (C) 1999 by Elsevier Science
Inc.