F. Gebhard et al., Ultrasound evaluation of gravity induced anterior drawer following anterior cruciate ligament lesion, KNEE SURG S, 7(3), 1999, pp. 166-172
Ultrasound is not so far a standard procedure to visualize the anterior dra
wer following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) lesions. This is because the
described techniques are either technically difficult or depend on the exp
erience of the performer and are not standardized. The purpose of this pros
pective analysis on ACL intact. ACL deficient and ACL reconstructed knees w
as to compare the diagnostic accuracy of prone ultrasonographic Lachman tes
ting with KT-1000 measurements in the same study population. Our technique
is based on a prone position of the patient. The thigh lies on the table su
rface such that the patella has no contact. The lower leg is placed on a ro
ll in the ankle area and flexed to 30 degrees. The transducer (5 MHz) is po
sitioned over the medial aspect of the popliteal fossa to visualize the fem
oral condyle as well as the tibial head. Under ultrasound control the lower
leg is manually lifted as far the thigh stays in contact with the surface
defining the startposition. The lower leg is then released and drawn by gra
vity into the anterior drawer position, the final position. The distance be
tween the posterior tangent from the medial femoral condyle to the medial t
ibial plateau was registered by three independent ultrasound measurements o
f the injured knee. The uninvolved opposite knee served as an internal cont
rol. The same procedure was done using a KT-1000 device (89 and 133 Newton
and manual maximum force). The patients were split into two groups: acute i
njury (A), and (B) 6 months following ACL repair with a patellar tendon gra
ft. All patients then underwent arthroscopy. In group A with acute ACL lesi
ons the anterior drawer resulted in 14.1 mm (+/- 3.5) and was significantly
(P < 0.001) different from the contralateral knee (7.7 mm +/- 2.9). The KT
1000 showed a comparable difference with 14.4 mm (+/- 3.9) for the injured
knee and 8.3 mm (+/- 3.4) for the uninjured (P < 0.001). Sonometrically, g
roup B patients showed no clear difference between the repaired (9.9 mm +/-
2.7) knee and its control (8.1 mm +/- 2.5). This was found for the KT-1000
results as well. The results derived from the ultrasound evaluation of the
anterior drawer correlated well with those fi om the KT-1000 (r = 0.46). B
ased on a minimum intra-individual difference of 5 min in the ultrasound me
asured anterior drawer, the sensitivity of the test in group A resulted in
0.96, and the specificity in 0.98. The described technique is reproducible,
painless and easy to perform in order to evaluate acute ACL tears using an
y commercially available ultrasound device. The reproducibility is similar
to the KT-1000 device. We recommend this technique for use in cases of acut
e ACL tears as well as in the follow-up of ACL repair.