This study investigates whether VCs' assessment policies of new venture sur
vival are consistent with those arising from the strategy literature (using
two established strategy perspectives). Strategy scholars suggest the natu
re of the markets, competition, and decisions made by the management team a
ffect a new venture's survival chances. The findings demonstrate that VCs'
assessment policies are predominantly consistent with those proposed by str
ategy scholars-providing insight into why VCs consider certain criteria in
their assessment of new venture survival as well as why some criteria are m
ore important in their assessment than others. Through this increased under
standing of venture capitalists' decision making, entrepreneurs seeking cap
ital may be better able to address their requests for funding to those crit
eria venture capitalists find most critical to the survival of a new ventur
e. venture capitalists may use these findings to better understand their ow
n decision making process, which, in turn, provides the opportunity to incr
ease evaluation efficiency.