Symptoms after total gastrectomy on food intake, body composition, bone metabolism, and quality of life in gastric cancer patients - Is reconstruction with a reservoir worthwhile

Authors
Citation
B. Liedman, Symptoms after total gastrectomy on food intake, body composition, bone metabolism, and quality of life in gastric cancer patients - Is reconstruction with a reservoir worthwhile, NUTRITION, 15(9), 1999, pp. 677-682
Citations number
93
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
NUTRITION
ISSN journal
08999007 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
9
Year of publication
1999
Pages
677 - 682
Database
ISI
SICI code
0899-9007(199909)15:9<677:SATGOF>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Gastric cancer is worldwide one of the most common causes of cancer death. Operation is the only treatment at this time that curls some patients. The side effects of the operation are, however, considerable, and include posto perative weight loss, loss of appetite, and other metabolic and nutritional changes. The recovery is very slow and incomplete. Reconstruction with dif ferent types of pouches has been asserted to facilitate the nutritional rec overy, but results from different studies are somewhat contradictory. Malnu trition, osteoporosis, osteomalacia, and impaired quality of life are often but not always described. We can, however, establish that after a total ga strectomy, gastric cancer patients are very much at risk for these complica tions, which are probably caused by impaired food intake and steathorrhea e ven when the patients are cured from their cancer disease. In order to mini mize the nutritional problems, it is crucial to avoid anastomotic narrowing and bile reflux. Roux-en-Y reconstruction seems to be the method of choice . Evidence from several randomized studies now speak in favor of including some type of pouch in the reconstruction. The most commonly used pouch toda y is the jejunal J-pouch. How the effect is exerted is not clear. probably both the reservoir function of the pouch and changes in intestinal transit time are important. The importance of nutritional surveillance of these pat ients should not be underestimated, and most of the observed differences fr om various reports are probably due to dissimilarity in the follow-up proto cols. A patient surviving his/her cancer has a decreased risk of developing severe disturbances in bone metabolism, food intake, body composition, and quality of life if the patient is under concerned nutritional surveillance and reconstructed with a pouch. (C) Elsevier Science Inc. 1999.