It has been proposed that depression is the product of deficits in self-man
agement skills: sell-monitoring, self-evaluation, and self-reinforcement. W
hile interventions based on this theory have shown promise, some of the bas
ic tenets upon which the theory is based lack empirical support. The presen
t experiment tested one such tenet-the claim that depressed individuals sel
ect smaller more immediate rein forcers (an impulsive choice) at the expens
e of larger more delayed reinforcers (a self-control choice). Currently, em
pirical support for this notion is sparse and contradictory. This study add
ressed several methodological problems in earlier studies Ly creating diver
gent groups based on Beck Depression Inventory scores, employing a task req
uiring multiple responses and applying a quantitative model to determine re
in forcer value. Analyses indicated no systematic difference between partic
ipants in the dysphoric and nondysphoric groups in ability to delay reinfor
cement. Thus, the cur rent results provide no support for the hypothesis th
at the 36 dysphoric individuals were unable to delay reinforcement relative
to the 21 nondysphoric individuals. Because respondents across the sample
as a whole showed a self-control preference, how ever, the data are consist
ent with findings in the experimental study of choice responding with adult
human subjects. Interpretations in terms of sensitivity and. pseudosensiti
vity to the experimental contingencies are explored.